I've been an official business owner for about 2 years now and, wow!, have I learned a ton. My plan had been to buy businesses passively and let good managers run them well. Sometimes this seems to work and sometimes I find myself more involved than I ever imagined. I came up with this concept of buying businesses through my never ending study of Warren Buffett and his strategies in conjunction with a little research into private equity. I mean, those guys make a ton, so why can't I do the same, starting on a smaller scale???
I'm a 42.5% owner in a moving and storage business, a 50% owner in a mixed use commercial/residential property, and a 51% owner of a chocolate company in Nashville. I still believe this is the way to wealth, along with some solid investments in public companies along the way. My thoughts are, if these businesses can start kicking off excessive cash, that cash can either be reinvested back into the company if high return opportunities exist or the cash can be withdrawn and invested into public companies at decent rates of return. Over time, I would imagine this strategy would work out profitably.
So here are some musings on what I've learned so far:
I'm not a big fan of real estate. It's just a different game and seems to be a constant struggle to find good tenants. This, in my mind, defeats the purpose of passively investing in it. You can hire a company to manage the property, and they take 7% or more of your monthly income, which eats pretty quickly into your investment. Over time, real estate appears to under perform the stock market anyway. There's a game here where you can make a ton of money (just ask our POTUS!), but it's not for me. I don't enjoy it and it lacks excitement. And, most of all, I can imagine going into old age getting bored and tired of the same old.
I've also learned debt isn't always terrible, but it is usually bad. We've taken out a number of loans to keep our businesses afloat, including when purchasing the businesses. These loans handicap the businesses and the individuals involved. I agree, not all debt is bad, but if possible to pay cash, I'd highly recommend it. There's good debt and bad debt, as we all know, and we've taken out both. If you can borrow money at 6% and invest it at 20%, you've got a pretty good deal on your hands. But if things turn, you're still stuck paying this 6%, while possibly not being able to invest that money at a higher rate. In fact, you may be put in a scenario where you're forced to take out money at 20%-30% just to stay afloat. Good luck investing that profitably . . . but sometimes you've gotta do what you gotta do. If you can use cash and invest at that 20%, you're in good shape.
Also, I agree with Buffett (as usual) that good managers make the business. We've got an outstanding manager, who holds ownership, in the chocolate company. I've never met anyone who works as hard as she does and we simply lucked upon her. The company would be dead in the water if we didn't have the right person in charge. We've got a really hard worker and driven operator at the moving and storage business. He is a straight shooter and is decisive and I like him, as well. We knew him prior, but we still were lucky to convince him to run the operation.
On that note, I think more and more that it is important to surround yourself with people who make you better and leave less and less time for those who don't. I find that some people are fun, but I leave hanging out with them disappointed and unfulfilled. You don't gain anything from the time spent. Others, you want to keep talking with all night because you can almost feel yourself growing intellectually. You leave inspired. I think one of the goals in life is to make more time for those people. I'm not saying that you shouldn't hang out with the fun crowd every now and then to blow off steam, but I think you need to prioritize who you choose to spend your time with.
Those are the big generalizations at the moment. For me, if these investments don't pan out and I have to go back to the dreaded corporate world, I'll surely be disappointed but I'll be glad I tried something different that I truly enjoy.
A hardnosed, in depth, and realistic look into the intricacies of success.
Friday, August 16, 2019
Wednesday, August 14, 2019
Replicating Buffett
I've often wondered why Warren Buffett's formula for building wealth is so hard to replicate. I think a few things are at play that prevent the average investor from obtaining the sorts of returns Buffett has throughout his career:
A misunderstanding of Buffett's entire approach
The wrong mindset and temperament
Fear of uncertain outcomes: Even though Buffett's approach to investing is tried and true, it's not certain that someone, following Buffett's approach to a tee, will have the same results. What if they enter the market right before a recession or crash and lose a large chunk of their net worth? Buffett has the confidence from years of experience on his side and he obviously has the means to wait out a dip in the market. In fact, these days, he looks forward to a dip. His Berkshire Hathaway has so much cash on hand right now that he'd love to put some of it to work in the market but equities have recently been out of his buying range. The hard part is waiting until the opportune time to place your bets. And even then, with a rather concentrated portfolio of your best picks, your portfolio will likely be much more volatile than Dow Jones or an index fund. Many people don't fare well with this sort of uncertainty.
This potential lack of a security net scares many potential investors off, as well, as they have families to take care of and other needs to be met. Society also tends to frown upon the guy who leaves a secure, high paying job, to pursue wealth in another venture. It appears irresponsible or greedy or lazy. However, those who do make the jump and do it properly tend to be rewarded. Read Charlie Munger's bio; he left a great career in law to pursue investing full time.
Taking the first step is also difficult. How do you know when to enter the market? This, I believe, can't be learned from the sidelines, but must be obtained from experience. But taking the first step in anything is difficult. We often don't embrace change, but change is necessary.
A misunderstanding of Buffett's entire approach: Many hear Buffett's name and think, "stock market genius". In reality, Buffett has many more layers than his stock picking prowess. He prefers to buy entire private businesses rather than parts of large companies via public trading. He also suggests avoiding excessive debt, but if you understand his approach, he uses significant amounts of borrowed money (insurance "float") to invest in other businesses. His debt is cheap or possibly free; "float" is the money his insurance companies collect as premiums that he can invest until a claim is placed and some money must be paid out to settle the claim. Therefore, if his insurance underwriting team writes profitable policies, the premiums he collects less the administrative expenses becomes additional profit that he can invest. He's basically being paid to borrow money! It's brilliant!
While Buffett's stock market record is absolutely incredible, he never would have been able to take advantage of Mr. Market to the extent that he has, had he not bought privately held businesses that kick off significant cash and provide investable income via insurance float. This is why I believe there is only one Warren Buffett. Buying a business is daunting. I know that from experience. And it takes a number of years for many businesses to reach their full potential or even turn a profit. This is such an important, yet under appreciated, aspect of Buffett's approach. I would venture to say that those who study Buffett's philosophy and follow his advice, rarely buy businesses. They are missing a key ingredient in duplicating Buffett's success. Others have had success in the market like Buffett. Read his, "The Superinvestors of Graham and Doddsville" article for evidence. But the magnitude of his accomplishments was made possible by the cash kicked off from his private businesses.
The wrong mindset and temperament: Buffett also ENJOYS the extreme long game, not because he has to, but it's simply his mindset. He wants to be able to sleep at night stress free; a portfolio manager doesn't have that luxury. Professional money managers can't touch Buffett because they need to keep up, year after year, with their colleagues and competitors. A portfolio manager can't tell his boss to give him 5 years before reviewing his performance. Buffett never had to answer to anyone but himself and his partners - and his partners had full faith in him.
Individual investors are in the same boat. They can't handle the ups and downs of the market and so they end up selling out at the wrong time. They don't focus on the long game. They don't have the confidence that things will work out.
Buffett is truly one of a kind and the goal doesn't need to be to attain greater wealth than him. If one can accomplish a tenth of what he has accomplished, they will find themselves very well off. To do that, you need to be comfortable with the uncertainty, understand the Oracle's entire approach, and keep a level head with a proper mindset.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)